35© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016 Z. Fang, R.L. Smith, Jr. (eds.), Production of Biofuels and Chemicals from Lignin, Biofuels and Biorefi neries 6, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1965-4_2
Chapter 2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges and Opportunities
Pedram Fatehi and Jiachuan Chen
2.1 Introduction
Forest biorefi nery is an alternative approach for the pulping industry [ 1 – 3 ] and aims to produce value-added products from lignocelluloses [ 2 ]. One biorefi nery scenario is to produce value-added products from lignin that is generated, but partially uti- lized, in pulping processes. To be industrially attractive, processes for producing lignin based chemicals should be able to be integrated into the pulping industry .
Lignin is the second largest renewable source after cellulose and the largest source of aromatic compounds on Earth. However, due to its amorphous and robust structure , the valorisation of lignin is challenging. Lignin can be converted to many products . Kraft lignin is currently used as a fuel in the Kraft pulping process, but it may be used in the production of carbon and composite fi bers [ 4 , 5 ]. Lignosulfonates have been proposed to be used as adhesive s [ 6 ], plasticisers in concrete [ 7 ] and dye dispersants [ 8 ]. Moreover, lignin has been used in polymeric applications as stabi- lizers [ 9 ], surfactants [ 10 ], epoxy resins [ 11 ] and superabsorbent hydrogels [ 4 ]. Finally, lignin of prehydrolysis liquor was proposed to be used as a fi ller modifi er [ 12 ] and a fuel source in the past [ 1 , 2 ].
However, lignin needs to be isolated from pulping spent liquors to allow the production of value-added products . Pulping spent liquors have many different
P. Fatehi (*) Key laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science and Technology of Ministry of Education , Qilu University of Technology , 250353 Jinan , China
Chemical Engineering Department , Lakehead University , 955 Oliver Road , P7B 5E1 Thunder Bay , ON , Canada e-mail: [email protected]
J. Chen Key laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science and Technology of Ministry of Education , Qilu University of Technology , 250353 Jinan , China e-mail: [email protected]
 

 
36
characteristics [ 13 ], and contain organic compounds (mainly lignin derived com- pounds, hemicelluloses and acids ) and inorganic materials (mainly residual chemi- cals of pulping processes) [ 2 ]. The chemistry of spent liquors signifi cantly impacts the processes by which lignin can be selectively and effectively isolated [ 14 , 15 ]. To have an economically feasible lignin production process, lignin needs to be extracted from pulping spent liquors effectively and selectively. In this chapter, various meth- ods that have been proposed in the literature, experimentally evaluated at laboratory scales or are commercially practiced for producing lignin are comprehensively reviewed. The challenges and perspectives of each method will be critically dis- cussed. The main objective of this chapter is to familiarize readers to the alternatives for isolating lignin compounds from four industrially produced spent liquors , which are black liquor and prehydrolysis liquor of Kraft pulping process and spent liquors of sulfi te pulping and neutral sulfi te semichemical (NSSC) pulping processes. This chapter includes the evaluation of only wood based pulping spent liquors . Methods to deal with less commonly practiced pulping methods, e.g. organosolv , are excluded from this chapter.
2.2 Kraft Pulping Process
2.2.1 Properties of Black Liquor
The black liquor of Kraft pulping process contains a signifi cant amount of lignin and residual pulping salts . Table 2.1 shows the properties of black liquor obtained from softwood and hardwood black liquors. It is observable that the solid , lignin and ash contents of black liquors could vary signifi cantly, and this variation is due to the amount of water used in pulping , and the evaporation stage, from which black liquor samples were collected in commercial processes.
In these samples, the amount of sugars in the black liquor samples was not reported, and the pH was higher than 13. Research study has focused on the isola- tion of Kraft lignin from black liquor, as described in the following sections .
Table 2.1 Properties of black liquors from commercial Kraft pulping processes
Black liquor source Solid content, wt.%
Lignin content, wt.%
Ash content, wt.%
Sugars, wt.% pH Ref.
Softwood 40 30.2 52.5 N/R 13.6 [ 16 ] Softwood 41 29.6 47 N/R 13.3 [ 16 ] Hardwood 49.7 27.9 48.4 N/R 13.5 [ 16 ] Softwood 18.3 6.38 8.43 0.35 13.4 [ 17 ] Softwood 12.7 4 N/R N/R N/R [ 18 ] Softwood / hardwood 21 7.1 N/R N/R N/R [ 18 ]
N/R not reported
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
37
2.2.2 Acidifi cation
Acidifi cation has been regarded as an effi cient and economical process for isolating lignin from black liquor. In this process, the pH of black liquor is reduced to 9, thus forming lignin particles that can be separated from black liquor via fi ltration [ 19 , 20 ]. Table 2.2 shows the properties of precipitated lignin from softwood (weak) black liquor from a Swedish mill [ 21 ]. The results in Table 2.2 show the properties of lignin after washing and purifi cation as acidifi cation of black liquor that generally produces lignin with an ash content of more than 1 wt.% prior to purifi cation .
As shown in Table 2.2 , the precipitates consist mainly of Klason lignin and mar- ginal amounts of carbohydrate s and ash . As expected, the main element of the pre- cipitates is carbon with a trace of sulfur [ 21 ]. It was claimed that increasing temperature during acidifi cation can generate large fl ocs that might cause fi ltration problems [ 21 ]. The lignin precipitated at pH 9 had between 3000 and 13,000 g/mol molecular weight [ 21 ]. Reducing the pH of black liquor is reported to decrease the average molecular weight of both softwood and hardwood lignin, but this also increases the sulfur content of lignin [ 21 , 22 ]. Kraft pulping degrades lignin into low molecular weight components with a high degree of sulfur substitution. Some elementary sulfur may also be released as a by- product and may contribute to sulfur content of Kraft lignin when the pH of acidifi cation is very low [ 22 ].
However, black liquor fi ltration at pH 9 is generally challenging because the ionic strength gradients are formed in the lignin precipitates during the washing process [ 23 ]. LignoBoost technology was developed and is now commercially used by Domtar Inc. in North Carolina, USA. Figure 2.1 shows the block process
Table 2.2 Properties of lignin precipitated at pH 9 via acidifi cation of a softwood (weak) black liquor [ 21 ]
Carbohydrate , wt.%
Klason lignin , wt.%
Acid soluble lignin , wt.%
Precipitated materials , wt.%
Ash , wt.% S, wt.% C, wt.% H, wt.%
2.7 93.7 2 3.3 0.1 1.69 64.88 6.3
Precipitation Filtration Mixing Filtration Crushing
Drying
Black liquor from evaporator
CO2
Lignin slurry
Wastes to evaporator
H2SO4
H2SO4
Lignin powder
Fig. 2.1 Block diagram of LignoBoost Technology [ 23 ]
 
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
38
diagram of the LignoBoost technology [ 23 ]. In this process, black liquor is taken from evaporators of the recovery section of Kraft process , and is acidifi ed with the help of CO 2 to pH 9. Lignin is precipitated at this pH (in a precipitation tank), and fi ltered. The reduction in pH of black liquor may result in generation of H 2 S gas in the process. The precipitated lignin ( slurry ) is re-dispersed in a subsequent mixing tank with acidic fi ltrate that is generated in a subsequent fi ltration stage. In this stage, the pH and temperature of precipitation and mixing tanks are the same, but the concentration gradients of acids in the washing stage (second fi ltration ) are low [ 23 ]. It has been reported that the acidifi cation of black liquor in the absence of mix- ing tank generates large crosslinked lignin macromolecules , but LignoBoost gener- ates small uncrosslinked lignin precipitates [ 23 ]. In the LignoBoost process, the change in the pH level, ionic strength and in lignin solubility will take place in the slurry , and not in the precipitates, which helps the properties of precipitated lignin [ 23 ]. After the second stage of fi ltration , precipitated lignin is crushed and dried to form lignin in powder form (Fig. 2.1 ).
Another process, LignoForce , was developed for isolating Kraft lignin from black liquor by FPInnovations [ 24 ]. LignoForce technology was commercialized by West Fraser Inc. in Alberta, Canada in 2016. In this process, black liquor is fi rst oxidized with O 2 and then acidifi ed to pH 9 by CO 2 . After the coagulation step, it is washed with acid in a fi lter press, where lignin precipitates are formed and separated from the system (Fig. 2.2 ). In this process, the fi ltrate of coagulation stage is sent to the evaporator of the Kraft process [ 24 ].
Both LignoBoost and LignoForce technologies have been commercialized in North America; however, there is no true comparison for the quality of lignin prod- ucts generated in LignoBoost and LignoForce . Table 2.3 shows the properties of precipitated lignin with and without the oxidation stage conducted in the LignoForce technology. It can be observed that the fi ltration rate, lignin content and the particle size of the precipitates were increased signifi cantly, but the ash content of the pre- cipitates was reduced. The solid content of the precipitates was similar in both cases. As is well known, the oxidation and acid / base neutralization reactions are exothermic. Therefore, the temperature of black liquor is increased after oxidation and acidifi cation. The charged groups of lignin are more associated at a higher tem- perature leading to more and larger colloidal lignin particles that are more easily fi ltered/separated from the suspension [ 24 ].
Oxidation Acidification Coagulation Filtration
Black liquor from evaporator
O2 Wastes to evaporatorCO2
H2SO4
Lignin powder
Fig. 2.2 Block diagram of LignoForce technology [ 24 ]
 
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
39
However, both LignoForce and LignoBoost are typically operated in batch or semi-batch modes, and they both have a low operating temperature of 70–75 °C. To have a continuous process, sequential liquid lignin recovery and purifi cation ( SLRP ) was introduced [ 16 , 25 , 26 ]. In this process, black liquor is acidifi ed with CO 2 to pH 9, and heated to 100–150 °C and kept at 4–8 bar (Fig. 2.3 ). This pretreatment gener- ates a concentrated lignin phase at the bottom of the pressurized vessel that can be pumped in a continuous mode. In the subsequent acidifi cation stage, lignin is sepa- rated from black liquor via reducing pH to 2. It has been reported that the tempera- ture changes from 100 to 150 °C increases the molecular weight of precipitated softwood Kraft lignin 4 times [ 25 ]. In this process, black liquor with a high ionic strength generates lignin product with a higher molecular weight [ 16 ].
2.2.3 Membrane
Membrane fi ltration has been used to extract lignin from black liquor [ 17 ]. In the past, the application of ultrafi ltration [ 27 – 30 ] and nanofi ltration [ 31 ] for isolating lignin from black liquor has been investigated. These studies reported promising results in isolating lignin. Ultrafi ltration results in low retention of lignin and a high retention of high molecular weight hemicelluloses , which is larger than that of lignin. In one study, lignin and hemicelluloses were separated from softwood
Table 2.3 Properties of lignin precipitated with or without oxidation with LignoForce technology [ 24 ]
Property Without oxidation With oxidation
Filtration rate, kg/h.m 2 0–80 100–200 Total solids , wt.% 30–58 60–62 Ash content, wt.% 0.2–15 0.1–0.7 UV lignin, wt.% 50–98 97–98 Lignin particle size, μm 0.2–1 5–10
AcidificationPressurized vessel
Black liquor from evaporator
Lignin
CO2 Wastes to evaporator
H2SO4
Fig. 2.3 Block diagram of sequential lignin liquid recovery and purifi cation process [ 16 , 25 ]
 
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
40
black liquor by nanofi ltration [ 17 ]. The introduction of ultrafi ltration prior to nano- fi ltration provided a high fl ux in the nanofi ltration, but the retention of lignin on the nanofi lter was reduced [ 17 ]. Various membrane types, e.g. polymeric or ceramic, have been used for isolating lignin, and polymeric membranes are found to be more cost effective than ceramic ones [ 17 ]. The cost of lignin production for generating 230 g/L lignin solution with nanofi ltration was 46 €/t in 2013, while the production of lignin solution with the same concentration using ceramic nanofi ltration cost 68 €/t in 2013. The introduction of ultrafi ltration increases the cost to 120 €/t (2013) when the same concentration of lignin solution is achieved [ 17 ]. Although the appli- cation of ultrafi lter increases the production cost, it generated lignin with fewer purities (i.e. less of hemicelluloses and other components in the lignin solution). However, the main problem of ultrafi ltration /nanofi ltration is the adhesion of lignin to the fi lter surface . As membranes separate lignin components based on their size, they also tend to isolate other components having a similar size ( hemicelluloses ). Although membranes increase the concentration of lignin in the solutions, they may not necessarily improve the purity of lignin. As lignin possesses functional groups , e.g. phenolic, carboxylic, they may be charged. Therefore, a membrane with a simi- lar charge introduces repulsion force for lignin segments. To increase the purity of linin and improve the fi ltration performance of membranes , membrane fi lters can be designed to repel lignin and other compounds in the solution. In this case, mem- branes with advanced surfaces that repel the black liquor components may improve the separation of lignin from black liquor [ 18 ].
2.2.4 Electrolysis
Electrolysis has also been introduced as an alternative to acidifi cation of black liquor. Electrolysis has the advantages of coagulating in situ of lignin and generat- ing sodium hydroxide [ 32 , 33 ]. In the past, electrolysis treatment was carried out on black liquor at different electrode potentials. Figure 2.4 shows a process for separat- ing lignin from black liquor via electrolysis technique in a continuous mode. In this process, a membrane separates anode and cathode compartments. In the anode sec- tion, oxygen is generated, pH drops and lignin precipitates via oxidation , while sodium hydroxide and hydrogen gas are generated on the cathode section. The pro- duction of hydrogen and oxygen gases as well as sodium hydroxide reduce the overall cost of this process, as they are value-added by product s of this process.
This process was only conducted at lab scales [ 34 ] and feasibility studies were executed to investigate if it is a viable process to be implemented commercially [ 34 , 35 ]. The main challenges of this process are the electricity requirement, membrane foaling/cleaning and separation of lignin from this system. A study in 1998 reported that, compared to CO 2 / acidifi cation process ($ 9.7 M), electrolysis process needed for 6–10 % production increase was $ 12.5 M capital investment for a pulp mill that produced 700 t/day pulp [ 35 ].
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
41
2.2.5 Solvent
Solvents have been applied to extract lignin from black liquor. Water-insoluble organic solvents , e.g. chloroform or dichloromethane, were added to black liquor to precipitate lignin [ 36 ], which had an acceptable fi ltration performance. It was pro- posed that the creation of hydrogen bonds between lignin and solvent molecules caused the precipitation and improved fi ltration of black liquor, as lignin was pro- posed to be surrounded by solvent molecules that made the lignin heavier and hydrophobic, which resulted in lignin agglomeration and precipitation [ 36 ].
The precipitation of lignin from black liquor with water-soluble solvents has also been studied. Alcohol s were reported to be effective in extracting lignin. For example, the treatment of eucalyptus Kraft black liquor with ethanol at different ratios (0.2–12 L ethanol/L of black liquor) resulted in approximately 40 % of the pentosanes and 22 % of lignin removal [ 36 ]. In another study on the use of ethanol, methanol and isopropanol in black liquor, a large amount of alcohol to black liquor (10–1) could be extracted yielding 60 % of the available lignin [ 37 ]. Furthermore, lignin recovery of more than 90 % was achieved via having cation-alcohol mixture in black liquor, e.g. calcium (II) or aluminum (III) salt (1.7 g/L of black liquor) and ethanol (0.5 v/v ethanol/black liquor). However, these studies were all conducted at a laboratory scale, and the industrial application of solvent based process requires solvent recovery, which presently is expensive and impractical in Kraft pulping processes.
2.3 Prehydrolysis Based Kraft Process
2.3.1 Properties of PHL
Dissolved pulp is produced via sulfi te or Kraft process . Presently, 60 % of dissolv- ing pulp is produced via sulfi te process, while 40 % is produced via Kraft process [ 38 ]. In the Kraft based dissolving pulp process, prehydrolysis is conducted prior to
H2
Lignin
O2
Anode Cathode
Black liquor
NaOH lignin
Fig. 2.4 Process for separating lignin from black liquor via electrolysis [ 32 ]
 
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
42
Kraft process and is performed via treating wood chips with saturated steam (at 443 K for 30 min) or hot water [ 38 ]. The prehydrolysis process isolates a part of lignin and hemicelluloses from wood chips. The chemical composition of prehy- drolysis liquor ( PHL ) is shown in Table 2.4 .
PHL contains less than 10 wt.% solids , in which approximately 1 wt.% is inor- ganic material [ 38 , 39 ]. It contains approximately 1.5–3 % hemicelluloses , 1–1.5 % lignin, 1.4 % acetic acid and less than 0.5 wt.% furfural. Acetic acid is formed via liberation of acetyl groups of woody biomass during hydrolysis that reduces the pH of the mixture to 3.6–3.8 (Table 2.4 ). Although the lignin content of PHL is small, the large production of PHL may provide an incentivise for the producing lignin- based value-added products . The low lignin concentration and the presence of other components in PHL make the direct use of PHL impractical [ 40 ]. Various methods have been proposed for isolating lignin from PHL [ 41 – 43 ]. These processes have different effi ciencies and selectivities for isolating lignocelluloses .
2.3.2 Acidifi cation of PHL
Similar to the acidifi cation of black liquor, the acidifi cation of PHL may be a viable method to isolate lignin from PHL (i.e. similar to black liquor) [ 39 ]. Table 2.5 lists the lignin and hemicelluloses removed from PHL at pH 2. It can be observed that approximately 50 % of lignin can be separated from PHL [ 40 ], but it was marginally removed from the PHL in another study [ 41 , 42 ]. These variations can be related to the properties of lignin in PHL [ 41 ]. Lignin removal/ precipitation via acidifi cation is signifi cantly affected by the structure / functional groups and molecular weight of the dissolved lignin in the PHL [ 43 ]. The variation in the effi ciency of acidifi cation can be attributed to the difference in the structures of lignin polymers in PHL. However, the removal of hemicellulose via acidifi cation may contaminate the isolated lignin in PHL. These results imply that acidifi cation process is case depen- dent, and may be an effective process for lignin removal.
The addition of poly (ethylene oxide) or PEO (0.02 g/g of lignin of PHL ) to acidifi ed PHL causes 43 % of lignin to be removed ( pH 2) [ 41 ]. In another study, 0.03 g/g addition of dodecyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (DTAC) to PHL facili- tated lignin removal by 17 % [ 44 ]. In these studies, hemicellulose removal was mar- ginal. The separated lignin contained lignin/PEO or lignin/DTAC complexes, which can be used in composite s [ 45 , 46 ]. As the lignin or lignin fl ocs usually contain
Table 2.4 Chemical composition of industrially produced prehydrolysis liquor ( PHL )
PHL ID pH
Dry Solids, wt.%
Ash , wt.%
Acetic acid, wt.%
Furfural, wt.%
lignin, wt.%
Hemicelluloses , wt.% References
1 3.68 5.39 1.11 1.31 0.18 1.01 1.50 [ 38 ] 2 3.80 7.60 1.21 1.41 0.31 1.51 3.16 [ 14 ]
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
43
more than 50 % dry solids , their incineration is cost-effective. Alternatively, these fl ocs can be used in the production of phenolic compounds such as adhesives and carbon fi bers [ 47 , 48 ], as the impurity content of these separated lignin or lignin fl ocs is not signifi cant [ 41 , 42 , 49 ].
2.3.3 Adsorption
Adsorption can be an alternative to separate lignin from PHL . In this regard, an adsorbent is mixed with PHL in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) to adsorb lignin. Then, the adsorbent encapsulated with lignin can be used as a value-added fi ller for composite production or transferred to another stage, in which the desorp- tion of lignin from the adsorbent will take place under desired conditions [ 14 ]. The absence of chemical reaction between the adsorbent and lignin promotes the desorp- tion and the recyclability of the adsorbent . In one report, activated carbon was used for adsorbing lignin from industrially produced PHL [ 50 ]. It was observed that the maximum adsorption of 400–700 mg/g for lignin was achieved. Furthermore, 200– 300 mg/g of hemicelluloses and 100 mg/g of furfural were adsorbed on activated carbon implying that adsorption was not selective. As this process is not selective in lignin isolation , the subsequent desorption and purifi cation of lignin may be compli- cated and expensive .
2.3.4 Flocculation
Flocculation has been practiced in industry for many years, and recent studies show that it could be used in separating lignin from PHL . In the past, poly diallyldimeth- ylammonium chloride (PDADMAC) and chitosan were added as fl occulants to PHL [ 2 , 51 ]. It has been reported that the separation of lignin is affected by the amount of fl occulant applied to the PHL, and the removal of lignin and other PHL compo- nents seems to be able to happen simultaneously. However, the concentration of fl occulant can control the removal of lignin and other components. A maximum removal of lignin (40 %) was achieved by adding 1.4 mg/g of PDADMAC or 1.6 mg/g of chitosan to the PHL [ 51 ]. In this case, the maximum hemicelluloses removal was obtained via 0.5 mg/g of PDADMAC or chitosan addition. As hemicelluloses
Table 2.5 Performance of acidifi cation of industrially produced prehydrolysis liquor ( PHL )
PHL Lignin removed, % Hemicelluloses removed, % Reference
1 47 41 [ 39 ] 2 4 NR a [ 40 ] 3 5 11.8 [ 41 ]
a Not Reported
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
44
can also precipitate in the fl occulation , the lignin-based materials with different compositions can be made via controlling the dosage of fl occulants in the PHL, and the product can be used in corrugated container (CC) boards or medium density fi ber board (MDF) production [ 51 ].
2.3.5 In Situ Adsorption / Flocculation System
To increase the adsorption of lignin, fl occulation and adsorption has been simulta- neously applied to PHL [ 49 , 52 ]. By adding fl occulants, larger fl ocs are formed in adsorbent /PHL systems, which can be more easily removed from the PHL system [ 49 , 52 ]. In one report, the addition of 0.5 mg/g PDADMAC to activated carbon / PHL system (1/40) at room temperature increased the adsorption of lignocelluloses from 200 to 250 mg/g [ 49 ], while the application of 0.8 mg/g cationic poly (acryl amide) or CPAM to precipitated calcium carbonate/PHL system (at 40 °C and 120 rpm) enabled the adsorption of 110 mg/g lignin. In addition, 250 mg/g of hemicel- luloses and 65 mg/g of furfural were adsorbed on precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) in the system [ 53 ]. When CPAM was replaced with PDADMAC , 203 mg/g of lignin, 530 mg/g of hemicelluloses and 58 mg/g of furfural were adsorbed on PCC under the same experimental conditions [ 53 ]. Similar to the adsorption or fl oc- culation processes stated above, the precipitates of in situ systems are impure and thus can only be directly used in composite s as stated above.
2.4 Spent Liquor of Sulfi te Process
2.4.1 Properties of Spent Liquor
The spent liquor of the sulfi te pulping process is generally acidic and contains lig- nosulfonate , sugars and residual pulping chemicals. In the sulfi te pulping process, lignin is sulfonated under acidic conditions to form lignosulfonate . Table 2.6 lists the properties of two spent liquor samples produced from magnesium based sulfi te pulping of Eucalyptus globulus .
It can be seen that the pH of the spent liquors is approximately 3–4, and they contain 7–8 wt.% lignosulfonate and 4 wt.% sugars. The overall dry solid content of
Table 2.6 Properties of spent liquors of the sulfi te pulping process [ 54 ]
pH Conductivity, mS/cm Lignosulfonate, % Sugars, % Total solids , % Suspended solids , %
3 14 7.9 4 16.9 – 3.7 14 8.3 4.1 16.1 0.21 3.7 15 8.5 5.7 17.1 0.3
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
45
the spent liquors is 16–17 wt.%. Presently, the spent liquors are mainly treated in the wastewater system of the sulfi te pulping process. In contrast to Kraft lignin , ligno- sulfonate cannot be precipitated by acidifi cation , which introduces challenges in its separation [ 55 – 57 ]. Membrane, ion exchange , amine extraction and electrodialysis have been used on a laboratory scale for separating lignosulfonate [ 58 ].
2.4.2 Membrane
Membrane technology has been studied for separating lignosulfonates from spent liquors for more than 30 years. The possibility for relatively easy scaling up makes ultrafi ltration attractive [ 59 ]. This process is not very sensitive to pH or temperature , and the molecular weight of the products can be controlled via selecting a desired membrane size. Generally, reverse osmosis can separate a solute/ solvent of a similar molecular size. The application of reverse osmosis for concentrating sulfi te liquors have been studied in the past [ 60 – 63 ]. In one study, the total solid of spent liquors was increased from 6 to 12 % with a fl ux of about 40 L/m 2 h by reverse osmosis that had lifetime of more than a year with effi cient membrane cleaning two to six times a week [ 64 ]. However, reverse osmosis needs a highly selective membrane , and salt rejection may hamper the separation [ 65 ]. The most promising ultrafi ltration system consists of a Microdyn-Nadir UP010 membrane that can separate high molecular weight lignosulfonates from the low molecular weight ones in the spent liquor [ 59 ].
Lignin recovery and fractionation by ultrafi ltration have been studied by several researchers [ 64 , 66 , 67 ]. Different membranes from polysulphone, cellulose acetate, fl uoropolymer with altered molecular weights cut-off (1 K, 5 K, 10 K, 20 K, 25 K, 50 K and 100 K) have been used for ultrafi ltration of spent liquors [ 68 ]. In one study, the ultrafi ltration of softwood calcium based spent sulfi te liquors with cellu- lose acetate membrane resulted in 40–66 % sugar concentration from 20 to 27 % [ 68 ]. The membrane was operated at the pressures of 300–600 psi (̴20–40 bar) and temperatures of 50–60 °C for 500–1100 h. A lignosulfonate solution of 50–80 wt.% was achieved that contained 80–96 % lignosulfonate on a solid basis [ 68 ].
A full-scale ultrafi ltration with a membrane area of 1120 m 2 was installed at Borregaard Industries (Sarpsbog, Norway) in a calcium bisulphate pulp mill in 1981 [ 64 ]. A membrane with molecular weight cut-off of 20 k allowed concentrating the spent liquor from 12 to 22 wt.% with a fl ow rate of 16 m 3 /h [ 64 ]. The lignosulfonate production from the spent liquor of an ammonium based sulfi te pulping process was also commercialized in Canada in the 1990s [ 69 ]. Figure 2.5 shows the process for producing lignosulfonate from spent liquor of this pulping process. The spent liquor is concentrated from 12 to 22 wt.% prior to the fermentation of sugar present in the spent liquor to ethanol with S. cerevisiae [ 69 ]. After fermentation , the residual liquor is concentrated to produce liquid lignosulfonate (50 wt.%), which can also be spray-dried and sold as lignosulfonate [ 69 ]. However, most membranes are unable to fractionate lignosulfonates or selectively purify them (i.e. they contain sugar con- taminants) due to the overlap in the molecular weights of lignosulfonate and sugars.
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
46
The membrane technology also requires a special selection of membranes for each spent liquor to reach an optimum yield and degree of purifi cation . In addition, dialy- sis is a time-consuming process [ 59 ].
2.4.3 Amine Extraction
Amine extraction has been proposed for separating lignosulfonate from spent liquors [ 70 ]. In this process, lignosulfonate is converted to lignosulfonic acid-amine adducts which are water insoluble [ 70 ]. The adducts can be isolated from lignosul- fonate via liquid-liquid extraction [ 70 ]. In the past, long chain aliphatic amine, tri- n- hexyl-amine, and poly ethyleneimine have been used for extracting lignosulfonates from spent liquors [ 55 , 71 – 74 ]. The main challenges of this process are the com- plete removal of the amine, the formation of salt , foam and emulsion, and the rela- tively slowness of the process [ 71 ]. Moreover, the high consumption of organic solvents limits the application of the process in the industrial scale.
2.4.4 Electrolysis
Similar to Kraft pulping , electrolysis can be applied to isolate lignosulfonate from spent liquor of sulfi te pulping process. In the past, spent liquor derived from mag- nesium bisulfi te pulping of beech was electrolyzed in an electrolysis cell [ 71 ]. During the electrochemical treatment (125 mA/cm 2 ; 60 °C; 180 min), anolyte was desalinated and the magnesium concentration was reduced to 60 %, which also reduced the pH of the solution from 5 to 1. The results showed that the electrolysis time increased the molar mass of the lignosulfonates from 5700 g/mol at pH 5 to 7400 g/mol at pH 1 and that the phenolic hydroxyl and sulfonic acid groups of sepa- rated lignosulfonate were similar. However, lignosulfonates obtained after electrol- ysis had 1.92 meq/g charge density at pH 1, whereas it was 1.59 meq/g at pH 5 prior to electrolysis [ 75 ]. The main challenge of this process is the high cost of electricity and the fouling of the electrodes, which adversely impacts its industrial application.
Evaporation
Ethanol
Lignin solution
Spent liquor Fermentation Evaporation Spray dryer
Lignin powder
Fig. 2.5 Commercial process for producing lignosulfonate from spent liquor of an ammonium based sulfi te pulping process [ 59 ]
 
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
47
2.4.5 Ion Exchange Resin
Adsorption processes have been regarded as alternative approaches to separate lig- nosulfonates from spent liquors , as they are simple and have relatively low opera- tional costs. In the past, the adsorption and desorption of lignosulfonate on minerals such as sandstone, limestone and dolomite have been studied [ 75 , 76 ]. Polyacryl or polyaromatic based resins , such as Amberlite XAD-4, XAD-7, and XAD-16, have high adsorption capacities that can be used for this purpose [ 59 ]. Generally, the adsorption process of phenolic compounds follows either the Freundlich or Langmuir model , and is spontaneous and exothermic. Therefore, conducting the process at ambient temperatures results in a more favourable adsorption and a maxi- mum adsorption of 100–300 mg/g can be achieved [ 59 ]. Figure 2.6 shows a process that includes the application of ion exchange resin , fi ltration and solvent treatment to isolate lignosulfonate from a spent liquor . It is seen that, lignosulfonate is fi rst adsorbed on the resin , then the resin is washed with water to remove the adsorbed sugars from the resin . Then, the resin is treated with ethanol, and this process desorbs and precipitates lignosulfonate in the system, which can be separated from the system with a fi lter. A series of fi ltration steps after this treatment can isolate lignosulfonate and ion exchange resin from ethanol. The ion exchange resin is regenerated and recycled, and lignosulfonate is the main product while ethanol is recycled to a previous stage. In the past, the adsorption of lignosulfonate from sul- fi te pulping spent liquor (250 mg/L lignosulfonate concentration) was studied on resin Amberlite XAD-7 adsorbent . The results showed that mixing the resin with
Ion exchange treatment
Washing
Ethanol precipitation
Lignosulfonate
Filtration
water
Ethanol
Ion exchange resin
To wastewater
To wastewater
Spent liquor
FiltrationRegeneration
Fig. 2.6 Process for producing lignosulfonate from spent liquor using ion exchange resin [ 59 ]
 
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
48
the spent liquor at the weight ratio of 900 mg/g of lignosulfonate / resin (in solution but on a dry basis) led to 300 mg/g of adsorption and thus extraction of lignosulfo- nate after 10 h at pH 2. The process resulted in lignosulfonates with the molecular weight ranging between 4600 and 398,000 g/mol [ 59 ].
2.5 Isolation of Lignosulfonate from Spent Liquor of NSSC Process
2.5.1 Properties of Spent Liquor in NSSC Process
Neutral Sulfi te Semi Chemical (NSSC) is a semichemical pulping process that pro- duces pulp with a yield of 60–80 %. In this process, wood chips are fi rst chemically treated with sodium sulfi te and sodium bicarbonate, and the treated wood chips are mechanically ground to produce pulp [ 15 ]. The chemical treatment of wood chips generates spent liquor that contains organics and inorganics. As an example, the spent liquor , which was produced in a Canadian NSSC process that used mixed hardwood , had a pH of 5.7 and contained 60.22 g/L of lignosulfonate , 22.13 g/L of hemicelluloses , 26.5 g/L acetic acid and a trace of furfural (0.52 g/L) [ 77 ]. It also contained about 63.8 g/L of ash , which probably originated from the pulping chemi- cals used in the pretreatment stage. In another study, the spent liquor of an NSSC process using hybrid poplar contained 59–69 % lignosulfonate , 2–24 % hemicellu- loses , 12–29 % acetic acid and 1.6–2.4 % formic acid on ash free basis [ 78 , 79 ]. The hemicelluloses had two different molecular weights of 8000–19,600 g/mol and 1000 g/mol. The lignosulfonate had average molecular weights of 1030 and 235 g/ mol [ 78 , 79 ]. Based on the molecular weight differences, lignosulfonate and hemi- celluloses were separated using an ultrafi lter in the same study.
2.5.2 Adsorption / Flocculation /Coagulation
Lignosulfonate has a phenolic structure that is hydrophobic in nature. If a surfactant is added to a spent liquor that contains lignosulfonate , it can interact with lignosul- fonate and coagulate it. This may lead to the precipitation of lignosulfonate from the spent liquor . In one report, a pH reduction to 1.8 caused 6 % lignosulfonate and 53 % hemicelluloses removal from a spent liquor [ 80 ]. Interestingly, acidifi cation followed by dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC) treatment of the spent liquor under the conditions of 22 °C, 1.8 pH and 10 mg/g of DTAC/SL resulted in 40 % lignosulfonate extraction from the spent liquor [ 81 ]. In this process, hemicel- lulose extraction was 78 %.
Adsorption using activated carbon has also been used for separating lignosulfonate from spent liquors [ 81 ]. The results showed that activated carbon adsorbed 0.1 g/g of lignosulfonate and 0.15 g/g of hemicelluloses at the original pH of spent liquor (5.7).
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
49
The maximum lignosulfonate adsorption of 0.33 g/g on activated carbon was obtained under the conditions of spent liquor to activated carbon of 30 g/g, 360 min treatment and 30 °C. The hemicellulose adsorption was 0.25 g/g under these condi- tions [ 81 ]. The maximum adsorption of 0.9 g/g lignosulfonate and 0.43 g/g of hemi- celluloses on activated carbon was obtained for conditions of 30 °C, 3 h and pH 7 with SL/AC weight ratio of 90 [ 82 ]. In another report, the adsorption of lignosulfo- nate and hemicelluloses was 0.26 g/g and 0.27 g/g on bentonite, respectively, which was achieved under the conditions of 50 °C, 100 rpm and 40 g/g SL/bentonite after 3 h of treatment [ 13 ].
Flocculation concept has been also used for extracting lignosulfonate from spent liquors . For example, poly (ethylene imine) or PEI (15 mg/g) treatment of an spent liquor that was produced in an NSSC process of mixed hardwood under the condi- tions of pH 6, 30 °C resulted in 37 % of lignosulfonate and 37 % hemicelluloses removal from spent liquors . In addition, the simultaneous application of poly (dial- lyldimethyl ammonium chloride) or PDADMAC and PEI (7.5 mg/g) showed 47 % lignosulfonate and 50 % lignosulfonate removals in the same study [ 77 ].
Alternatively, the simultaneous application of adsorption and fl occulation can be used for isolating lignosulfonate from spent liquors . In one study, the addition of poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) or PDADMAC to the spent liquor and activated carbon system led to 2.5 g/g adsorption of lignosulfonate to 2.5 g/g on AC [ 82 ]. In another work, the adsorption of lignosulfonate was increased to 1.8 g/g and that of hemicellulose to 0.45 g/g via adding 15 mg/g of poly (diallyldimethylam- monium chloride) or PDADMAC to the system of SL/bentonite stated above (treated under the conditions of 40 g/g of SL/bentonite at 50 °C and 3 h) [ 13 ].
However, the precipitates made from the addition of fl occulants, surfactants or adsorbents are not pure lignosulfonate , as they contain organic compounds, such as hemicelluloses , fl occulants such as PDADMAC , or adsorbent s such as bentonite. Therefore, a desorption stage is needed to isolate lignosulfonate from precipitates and to further purify lignosulfonate so that lignosulfonate can be used as a value- added product. However, it is possible to use in packaging paper production as fi ll- ers without purifi cation . Although fl occulation /adsorption/coagulation process seems to be simple and industrially attractive, they are manly based on laboratory scale experiments. Large scale analyses should be conducted to promote their indus- trial development .
2.5.3 Solvent Extraction
The application of solvents in removing lignosulfonate from spent liquor of an NSSC process has been assessed by Tarasov et al. [ 83 ]. It was reported that ligno- sulfonate could be removed from the spent liquor via mixing it with ethanol, ace- tone or isopropyl alcohol . A maximum lignosulfonate removal of 59 % was achieved via mixing isopropyl or acetone with the spent liquor at the weight ratio of 20/80 ( solvent / spent liquor ) and pH 5.7. A lower removal was obtained via mixing ethanol
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
50
with spent liquor under the same experimental conditions. About 30 % of the hemi- celluloses was also removed via mixing solvents with spent liquor , regardless of the solvent type. This study also reported a molecular weight and anionic charge den- sity of 5000–70,000 g/mol and 0.2–1.8 meq/g for the precipitates, respectively [ 83 ]. As precipitates contain impurities (e.g. hemicelluloses ), the product can be used as organic compounds in composite s. The recovery of solvent complicates the applica- tion of solvents in lignin recovery and makes the practical application of solvent treatment less likely on an industrial scale.
2.6 Conclusions and Future Outlook
Different options have been reviewed and evaluated on the laboratory scale to extract lignin from pulping spent liquors . To extract Kraft lignin from black liquor, acidifi cation is the most industrially reliable process, and LignoBoost and LignoForce technologies were designed based on the acidifi cation concept. Pure lignin can be produced in these processes. To extract lignosulfonate from sulfi te spent liquors , ultrafi ltration seems to be the most industrially applicable method, but the extracted lignin will have impurities such as hemicelluloses . Laboratory experi- ments on adsorption and fl occulation techniques for isolating lignin derivatives from prehydrolysis liquors ( PHL ) or spent liquor of the NSSC process show accept- able results. Flocculation seems to be more attractive than adsorption for extracting lignin based compounds from spent liquors as it is easier to be implemented in a large scale. However, the fl occulation and adsorption processes cannot generate pure lignin and the product contains either organic impurities such as hemicellu- loses or inorganic impurities such as clay (as an adsorbent ). There is no clear means for producing pure lignin via the fl occulation concept. A desorption process is required to separate lignin from an adsorbent to produce pure lignin via the adsorp- tion concept. Electrolysis and solvent extraction showed promising results on a laboratory scale, but the main barrier for their implementation on the industrial scale is the high usage/cost of electricity and solvent recovery.
Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge Canada Research Chair program of Government of Canada and Industrial Research Chair program of NOHFC for supporting this research.
References
1. Dansereau LP, El-Halwagi M, Mansoornejad B, Stuart P. Framework for margins-based plan- ning: forest biorefi nery case study. Comput Chem Eng. 2014;63:34–50.
2. Saeed A, Fatehi P, Ni Y. Chitosan as a fl occulant for pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dis- solving pulp production process. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86:1630–6.
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
51
3. Van Heiningen A. Converting a kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefi nery. Pulp Pap Canada. 2006;107:38–43.
4. El Mansouri NE, Salvadó J. Structural characterization of technical lignins for the production of adhesives: application to lignosulfonate, Kraft, soda-anthraquinone, organosolv and ethanol process lignins. Ind Crop Prod. 2006;24:8–16.
5. Lora JH, Glasser WG. Recent industrial applications of lignin: a sustainable alternative to nonrenewable materials. J Polym Environ. 2002;10:39–48.
6. Yang D, Li H, Qin Y, Zhong R, Bai M, Qiu X. Structure and properties of sodium lignosulfo- nate with different molecular weight used as dye dispersant. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2014;36:532–9.
7. Kumar S, Mohanty A, Erickson L, Misra M. Lignin and its applications with polymers. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy. 2009;3:1–24.
8. Olsen SN, Bohlin C, Murphy L, Borch K, Mcfarland K, Sweeny M, Westh P. Effects of non- ionic surfactants on the interactions between cellulases and tannic acid: a model system for cellulase–poly-phenol interactions. Enzym Microb Technol. 2011;49:353–9.
9. Sasaki C, Wanaka M, Takagi H, Tamura S, Asada C, Nakamura Y. Evaluation of epoxy resins synthesized from steam exploded bamboo lignin. Ind Crop Prod. 2013;43:757–61.
10. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Raghavan P, Kessler MR. Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2014;2:1072–92.
11. Kadla J, Kubo S, Venditti R, Gilbert R, Compere A, Griffi th W. Lignin-based carbon fi bers for composite fi ber applications. Carbon. 2002;40:2913–20.
12. Fatehi P, Hamdan FC, Ni Y. Adsorption of lignocelluloses of pre-hydrolysis liquor on calcium carbonate to induce functional fi ller. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94:531–8.
13. Oveissi F, Fatehi P. Production of modifi ed bentonite via adsorbing lignocelluloses from spent liquor of NSSC process. Bioresour Technol. 2015;174:152–8.
14. Fatehi P, Ni Y. Integrated forest biorefi nery-prehydrolysis/dissolving pulping process. In: Zhu J, Zhang X, Pan X, editors. Sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and fi bers from forest biomass, American chemical society symposium series, NY, 1067. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2011. p. 475–506.
15. Fatehi P, Ni Y. Integrated forest biorefi nery-sulfi te process. In: Zhu J, Zhang X, Pan X, editors. Sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and fi bers from forest biomass, American chemical society symposium series, NY, 1067. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2011. p. 409–41.
16. Velez J, Thies MC. Liquid lignin from the SLRP process: the effect of process conditions and black liquor properties. J Wood Chem Technol. 2016;36:27–41.
17. Arkall A, Olsson J, Wallberg O. Process performance in lignin separation from softwood black liquor by membrane fi ltration. Chem Eng Res Des. 2014;92:1792–800.
18. Manttari M, Hatakka JLH, Louhi-Kultanen M, Kallioinen M. Separation phenomena in UF and NF in the recovery of organic acids from Kraft black liquor. J Membr Sci. 2015;490:84–91.
19. Sun RC, Tomkinson J, Bolton J. Effects of precipitation pH on the physicochemical properties of the lignins isolated from the black liquor of oil palm empty fruit bunch fi bre pulping. Polym Degrad Stab. 1999;63(2):195–200.
20. Mussatto SI, Fernandes M, Roberto IC. Lignin recovery from brewer’s spent grain black liquor. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;70:218–23.
21. Helander M, Theliander H, Lawoko M, Hentiksson G, Zhang L, Lindstrom LE. Fractionation of technical lignin: molecular mass and pH effects. BioRes. 2013;8(2):2270–82.
22. Laurencon TV, Hansel FA, Da Silva TA, Ramos LP, de Muniz GIB, Magalhaes WLE. Hardwood and softwood Kraft lignins fractionation by simple sequential acid precipitation. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;154:82–8.
23. Tomani P. The LignoBoost process. Cell Chem Technol. 2010;44(1–3):53–8.
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
52
24. Kouisni L, Holt-Hindle P, Maki K, Paleologou M. The Lignoforce system: a new process for the production of high quality lignin from black liquor. J Sci Technol For Prod. 2012;2(4):6–10.
25. Velez J, Thies MC. Temperature effect on molecular weight properties of liquid lignin recov- ered from Kraft black liquor. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2015;3(6):1032–8.
26. Lake MA, Blackburn JC. Process for recovering lignin. US patent WO2011037967 A2. 2011. 27. Alén R, Sjöström E, Vaskikari P. Ultrafi ltration studies on alkaline pulping liquors. Cellul
Chem Technol. 1986;20:417–20. 28. Bhattacharjee C, Sarkar P, Datta S, Gupta BB, Bhattacharya PK. Parameter estimation and
performance study during ultrafi ltration of Kraft black liquor. Sep Purif Technol. 2006;51(3):247–57.
29. Paleologou M, Cloutier JN, Ramamurthy P, Berry RM, Azarniouch MK, Dorica J. Membrane technologies for pulp and paper applications: an outline of Paprican’s current work. Pulp Pap Can. 1994;95(10):386–90.
30. Wallberg O, Jönsson AS, Wimmerstedt R. Ultrafi ltrationof Kraft black liquor with a ceramic membrane. Desalination. 2003;156:145–53.
31. Keyoumu A, Sjödahl R, Henriksson G, Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Lindström ME. Continuous nano- and ultra-fi ltration of Kraft pulping black liquor with ceramic fi lters: a method for lowering the load on the recovery boiler while generating valuable side-products. Ind Crop Prod. 2004;20:143–50.
32. Loutfi H, Blackwell B, Uloth V. Lignin recovery from Kraft black liquor: preliminary process design. Tappi. 1991;74:203–10.
33. Ghatak HR. Electrolysis of black liquor for hydrogen production: some initial fi ndings. Intl J Hydrog Energy. 2006;31:934–8.
34. Cloutier JN, Azarniouch MK, Callender D. Electrolysis of weak black liquor Part I: laboratory study. J Pulp Pap Sci. 1993;19(6):244–8.
35. Davy MF, Uloth VC, Cloutier JN. Economic evaluation of black liquor treatment processes for incremental Kraft pulp production. Pulp Pap Canada. 1998;99(2):35–9.
36. Whalen DM. A simple method for precipitating easily fi lterable acid lignin from Kraft black liquor. Tappi J. 1975;58(5):110–2.
37. Villar JC. Precipitation of Kraft black liquors by alcohol calcium solutions. Sep Purif Technol. 1996;31(12):1721–39.
38. Saeed A, Jahan MS, Li H, Liu Z, Ni Y, van Heiningen A. Mass balances of components dis- solved in the pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process from Canadian hardwoods. Biomass Bioen. 2012;39:14–9.
39. Sixta H. Hand book of pulp, vol. 1. 1st ed. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2006.
40. Liu Z, Fatehi P, Jahan MS, Ni Y. Separation of lignocellulosic materials by combined processes of prehydrolysis and ethanol extraction. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:1264–9.
41. Shi H, Fatehi P, Xiao H, Ni Y. A combined acidifi cation/peo fl occulation process to improve the lignin removal from the pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:5177–82.
42. Shi H, Fatehi P, Xiao H, Ni Y. Optimizing PEO fl occulation process for isolating lignin of pre- hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:5330–5.
43. García A, Toledano A, Serrano L, Egüés I, González M, Marín F, Labidi J. Characterization of lignins obtained by selective precipitation. Sep Purif Technol. 2009;68:193–8.
44. Shi H, Fatehi P, Xiao H, Ni Y. A process for isolating lignin of pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft pulping process based on surfactant and calcium oxide treatments. Biochem Eng J. 2012;68:19–24.
45. Park Y, Doherty WOS, Halley PJ. Developing lignin based resin coating and composites. Ind Crop Prod. 2008;27:163–7.
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
53
46. Kadla JF, Kubo S. Miscibility and hydrogen bonding in blends of poly ethylene oxide and Kraft lignin. Macromolecules. 2003;36:7803–11.
47. Cheng S, Dcruz I, Yuan Z, Wang M, Anderson M, Leitch M, Xu C. Use of biocrude derived from woody biomass to substitute phenol at a high- substitution level for the production of biobased phenolic resol resins. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;121:2743–51.
48. Cheng S, Yuan Z, Anderson M, Leitch M, Xu C. Synthesis of bio-based phenolic resins/adhe- sives using methylolated wood-derived bio-oil. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;126:E430–40.
49. Liu X, Fatehi P, Ni Y. Removing the inhibitors of pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolv- ing pulp production process using adsorption and fl occulation processes. Bioresour Technol. 2012;116:492–6.
50. Liu X, Fatehi P, Ni Y. Adsorption of lignocellulosic materials dissolved in pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp process on oxidized activated carbons. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:11706–11.
51. Saeed A, Fatehi P, Ni Y. An integrated process for removing the inhibitors of the pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp process via cationic polymer treatment. Biotechnol Prog. 2012;68:19–24.
52. Shen J, Fatehi P, Soleymani P, Ni Y. A process to utilize the lignocelluloses of pre-hydrolysis liquor in the lime kiln of Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10035–9.
53. Fatehi P, Shen J, Hamdan FC, Ni Y. Improving the adsorption of lignocelluloses of prehydroly- sis liquor on precipitated calcium carbonate. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92:2103–10.
54. Restolho JA, Prates A, de Pinho MN, Afonso MD. Sugars and lignosulphonates recovery from eucalyptus spent sulphite liquor by membrane processes. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33:1558–66.
55. Ringena O, Saake B, Lehnen R. Isolation and fractionation of lignosulfonates by amine extrac- tion and ultrafi ltration: a comparative study. Holzforschung. 2005;59:405–12.
56. Fredheim GE, Braaten SM, Christensen BE. Molecular weight determination of lignosulfo- nates by size-exclusion chromatography and multi-angle laser light scattering. J Wood Chem Technol. 2003;23(2):197–215.
57. Ekeberg D, Gretland KS, Gustafsson J, Braten SM, Fredheim GE. Characterization of ligno- sulfonate and Kraft lignin by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;565:121–8.
58. Chakrabarty K, Krishna KV, Prabirkumar S, Ghoshal AK. Extraction and recovery of lignosul- fonate from its aqueous solution using bulk liquid membrane. J Membr Sci. 2009;330:135–44.
59. Sumerskii I, Korntner P, Zinovyev G, Rosenau T, Potthast A. Fast track for quantitative isola- tion of lignosulfonates from spent sulfi te liquors. RSC Adv. 2015;5:92732–42.
60. Tsapiuk EA, Byrk MT, Medvedev MI, Kochkodan VM. Fractionation and concentration of lignosulphonates by ultrafi ltration. J Membr Sci. 1989;47:107–30.
61. Wiley AJ, Ammerlaan ACF, Dubey GA. Application of reverse osmosis to processing of spent liquors from the pulp and paper industry. Tappi J. 1967;50:455–60.
62. Wiley AJ, Dubey GA, Holderby JM, Ammerlaan ACF. Concentration of dilute pulping wastes by reverse osmosis and ultrafi ltration. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1970;42:R279–89.
63. Ammerlaan ACF, Lueek BF, Wiley AJ. Membrane processing of dilute pulping wastes by reverse osmosis. Tappi J. 1969;52:118–22.
64. Bhattacharya A, Todi RK, Tiwari M, Bhattacharjee C, Bhattacharjee S, Datta S. Studies on ultrafi ltration of spent sulfi te liquor using various membranes for the recovery of lignosulpho- nates. Desalination. 2005;174:287–97.
65. Basal IK, Wiley AJ. Fractionation of spent sulfi te liquors using ultrafi ltration cellulose acetate membrane. Environ Sci Technol. 1974;8(13):1085–90.
66. Nystrom M, Lindstrom M. Optimal removal of chlorolignin by ultrafi ltration achieved by pH control. Desalination. 1988;70:145–56.
2 Extraction of Technical Lignins from Pulping Spent Liquors, Challenges…
 

 
54
67. Wilde FG. Recovery of lignosulphonate from a calcium bisulphite pulp mill effl uent by ultra- fi ltration. Desalination. 1988;67:495–505.
68. Bansal IK, Wiley AJ. Membrane processes for fractionation and concentration of spent sul- phite liquors. Tappi. 1975;58(1):125–30.
69. Magdzinski L. Tembec Temiscaming integrated biorefi nery. Pulp Pap Canada. 2006;107(6):44–6.
70. Lin SY. Commercial spent pulping liquor. In: Lin SY, Dence CW, editors. Methods in lignin chemistry. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 75–80.
71. Ringena O, Saake B, Lehnen R. Characterization of electrolyzed magnesium spent-sulfi te liquor. Holzforschung. 2005;59(6):604–11.
72. Eisenbraun EW. The separation and fractionation of lignosulfonic acid from spent sulfi te liquor with tri-n-hexylamine in organic solvents. Tappi. 1963;2:104–7.
73. Haars A, Lohner S, Huttermann A. Quantitative determination of lignosulfonates from sulfi te spend liquors using precipitation with polyethyleneimine. Holzforschung. 1981;3:59–65.
74. Kontturi AK, Sundholm G. The extraction and fractionation of lignosulfonates with long chain aliphatic amine. Acta Chem Scand. 1986;40:121–5.
75. Grigg RB, Bai BJ. Calcium lignosulfonate adsorption and desorption on Berea sandstone. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;279:36–45.
76. Pranovich AV, Reunanen M, Sjoholm R, Holmbom B. Dissolved lignin and other aromatic substances in thermomechanical pulp waters. J Wood Chem Technol. 2005;25:109–32.
77. Sitter T, Oveissi F, Fatehi P. A process for producing lignocellulosic fl ocs from NSSC spent liquor. J Biotechnol. 2014;173:19–23.
78. Area MC, Felissia FE, Nunez CE, Venica A, Valade JL. Upgrading spent liquors from NSSC process: III separation of spent liquors components by ultrafi ltration. Cellul Chem Technol. 2000;34:173–82.
79. Area MC, Felissia FE, Nunez CE, Venica A, Valade JL. Upgrading spent liquors from NSSC process: quality and quantity of organic components. Cellul Chem Technol. 2000;34:525–35.
80. Cave G, Fatehi P. Separation of lignosulfonate from spent liquor of neutral sulphite semi- chemical pulping process via surfactant treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;151:39–46.
81. Dashtban M, Gilbert A, Fatehi P. Separation of lignocelluloses from spent liquor of NSSC pulping process via adsorption. J Environ Manag. 2014;136:62–7.
82. Dashtban M, Gilbert A, Fatehi P. A combined adsorption and fl occulation process for produc- ing lignocellulosic complexes from spent liquors of neutral sulfi te semichemical pulping pro- cess. Bioresour Technol. 2014;159:373–9.
83. Tarasov D, Leitch M, Fatehi P. Production of lignosulfonate in NSSC‐based biorefi nery. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31(6):1508–14.
P. Fatehi and J. Chen
 

 
http://www.springer.com/978-981-10-1964-7